Paul Thomas Anderson is one of the best, if not one of the
absolute best, directors working today.
He has directed some of my personal favorite movies (like Punch Drunk
Love and There Will Be Blood,) as well as some of the more interesting films to
come out of modern cinema (like Hard Eight and The Master.) In summary:
I think I could be called a straight-up Thomas Anderson fan-boy, and I
am in no way ashamed of that.
Yet, alas; even I,
who am likely to squeal girlishly when Anderson’s name appears in the opening
credits of a flick, am having a hard time finding ways to defend his latest
release, Inherent Vice. It is a movie
that I legitimately want to like, but am having a horrible time doing so.
Inherent Vice has all of the trademarks of modern T.
Anderson. It has a crazy cast of
characters, a setting from another time period with its own vibe, and a
soundtrack filled with era classics and Johnny Greenwoods excellent score. The characters are quirky, and performed in
an equally quirky measure. These are
things I loved about Anderson
movies like Boogie Nights, so why don’t they work here?
In interviews it has been mentioned that Anderson was inspired to make this flick
after seeing the classic Hawks-Bogart flick, The Big Sleep; and in a way he
succeeded to get that movies vibe. The Big
Sleep is infamous for being hard to follow, but is incredibly entertaining
regardless; and Inherent Vice certainly gets the “hard to follow” part of that
equation. The movie unfortunately just
isn’t that entertaining to watch, and falters because of it.
Inherent Vice, at its core, is an art-house stoner-comedy;
much like The Big Lebowski before it. It
is confusing, abstract and bizarre (though perhaps not bizarre enough,) but Anderson does not seem to
get why those kind of movies work in the first place. Inherent Vice drudges through its meandering,
borderline nonsensical plot like it’s a dark serious Anderson drama; but that’s not what this
movie is.
There is a reason that Harold and Kumar go to White Castle
is less that ninety minutes long, a
movie like this needs to have a certain energy to it to keep the audience
invested. Inherent Vice is just too slow
and too long. When the movie is funny, it’s
really really funny; but you often have to wait twenty minutes for each
punch-line.
The movies big problem is that it thinks it’s a fast paced
comedy, but it was kept at the two and a half hour length for no good
reason. If the filmmakers would have
been willing to edit this thing down to a solid hundred minute funfair, then it
might have worked really well. As it is,
Inherent Vice is a great comedy hiding inside a bloated, pretentious shell.
If you’re a hardcore Paul Thomas Anderson fan like me, this
is a must see; but if you just want to see a good movie, then there are more
pressing tickets to purchase.
No comments:
Post a Comment